Advertisement SA Forum is an invited essay from experts on topical issues in science and technology. Last Friday the U.
This is a long article, and it may take a few moments to load. Genocide and So On "I mean the great act of genocide in the modern period is Pol Pot, through - that atrocity - I think it would be hard to find any example of a comparable outrage and outpouring of fury and so on and so forth.
In a long, illustrious career, Chomsky has amassed a formidable array of books, articles, and speeches. He has been a tireless advocate for the underdog, and has demonstrated admirable commitment to his principles.
The underdogs, however, are not Speculating causes essay the good guys, a fact clearly illustrated by the Khmer Rouge. The question of whether or not Noam Chomsky supported the Khmer Rouge is not as clear as either his critics or his defenders would like to pretend.
His critics frequently extract a handful of quotes from "Distortions at Fourth Hand" or After the Cataclysm and suggest that Chomsky was an enthusiastic advocate for the Cambodian communists. His defenders, meanwhile, limit their collections of quotes to Chomsky's disclaimers Speculating causes essay qualifiers, conveniently ignoring the underlying theme of his articles: Gathering all of Chomsky's fig leaves into a single pile, they exclaim: My, what a lot of greenery.
There was an atrocity, people were outraged, so on and so forth, blah blah blah.
The reaction is Chomsky's primary concern; genocide itself is a lesser point. If Chomsky was initially skeptical of the reports of Khmer Rouge atrocities, he was certainly not alone. Given that he now acknowledges the brutality of the Khmer Rouge regime, is it fair to continue to criticize him? A peculiar irony is at the heart of this controversy: Noam Chomsky, the man who has spent years analyzing propaganda, is himself a propagandist.
Whatever one thinks of Chomsky in general, whatever one thinks of his theories of media manipulation and the mechanisms of state power, Chomsky's work with regard to Cambodia has been marred by omissions, dubious statistics, and, in some cases, outright misrepresentations.
On top of this, Chomsky continues to deny that he was wrong about Cambodia. He responds to criticisms by misrepresenting his own positions, misrepresenting his critics' positions, and describing his detractors as morally lower than "neo-Nazis and neo-Stalinists.
Misconceptions, it seems, have a very long life. The Right Villains Any detailed examination of Chomksy's comments on Cambodia should begin with his comments in the wake of Lon Nol and Sirik Matak's coup, which overthrew Prince Norodom Sihanouk, and brought to power a staunchly pro-American regime.
In Cambodia, prior to the coup, the war in neighboring Vietnam had been held largely in check. Fighting was limited mainly to the border areas, where large numbers of Vietnamese communists had set up sanctuaries inside Cambodian territory.
After the coup, Sihanouk promptly allied himself with the rebels, and in June,Chomsky wrote a long article in the New York Review of Books, outlining the dire consequences of American involvement in Cambodia. Despite some misleading remarks, it is, on the balance, a very astute analysis.
Chomsky accurately predicted the repercussions of Sihanouk's alliance with the rebels: This would seem unlikely.
Now, however, Sihanouk, the 'most ardent and passionate advocate' of the national cause, the person whom one American expert described as being 'a significant expression of the Cambodian people's will,' has identified himself with the rebels. It is doubtful that the right-wing Lon Nol government, with its narrow urban base, can counter this popular force or win it over.
So many reputations and careers are at stake that glorious victories are guaranteed. On probabilistic grounds alone, one would expect that American military intelligence can't always be wrong about everything.
The headquarters of the Vietnamese resistance forces and the bases that they use for R-and-R must be somewhere, and they may well be found and destroyed during the American-Saigon sweep.
Whether the invading troops will withdraw remains to be seen. That the countryside will be devastated and its population removed or destroyed is reasonably certain.05Aug03 - Bank watching in Basel All pictures on this page are by Richard Janssen I was on business-travel from city to city in Switzerland.
After the work in Basel I . Employees may get retrenched for example when a firm no longer needs the services of the employees or if the company itself shuts down its operations.
It is u. In my last post I discussed at length the question of rationality. I concluded that contrary to the opinion of behavioral economics, humans do make decisions that they believe to be in their best interests, in my view the correct definition of a rational decision.
Alan Abel reported his own death in a skiing accident as an elaborate hoax on New Year's Day, (), to get his obituary published in The New York Times.
Abel died on September 14, Women in the Military - I have chosen my persuasive essay to be focused on why women should be in the military. I chose this topic in order to get a full view on how women in the military are thought of.
Back to English 1A.
This website is a culmination of articles and user comments that discuss evidence of God based on Science, Philosophy, and Experience. Paul Kingsnorth is a writer and poet living in Cumbria, England. He is the author of several books, including the poetry collection Kidland and his fictional debut The Wake, winner of the Gordon Burn Prize and the Bookseller Book of the Year Award. Kingsnorth is the cofounder and director of the Dark Mountain Project, a network of writers, artists, and thinkers. More Than Human: Embracing the Promise of Biological Enhancement [Ramez Naam] on tranceformingnlp.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Distilling the most radical accomplishments being made in labs around the world, including gene therapy.
Any complicated problem has many possible causes. Your job for this essay is to choose an important, complex problem you care about and, using research, argue for what you believe are the most likely causes of this problem. (You must argue for at least two causes.).