It is your responsibility to approach and secure potential advisors; advisors are not assigned to you. Primary and co-advisors work closely with you to review your work as it progresses and provide feedback. The responsibilities of a second reader may vary and are sometimes limited to general quality control. Both advisors hold approval authority over both the thesis proposal and the thesis itself your Academic Associate provides final approval of the proposal; the Department Chair provides final approval of the thesis.
Process Letter to My Second Reader Second reader thesis. You now hold in your hands my thesis draft entitled Stalking America.
I cut over twenty-five pages from the total page count, mostly through cuts, tailoring, minor character deletions and I have to confess, excessive white spaceson top of the Second reader thesis or so pages I cut in the time surrounding residency and leading up to sending you my first draft.
There was a lot of condensing. I also changed the order around in a number of scenes. Those and everything else should be clear though. And then it prints out so tiny, new fangled technology. Let me go back for a minute to your letter where you discuss your background as a poet and your resistance to some bestsellers.
That is actually one of the reasons I was most excited to have you as a second reader. I am not a poet, but I wanted to get some feedback outside of the novel form. I think this is a good thing, because it is starting to give the work a thrust, but I am also interested after graduatingin going back and re-developing the more non-linear feel of the work.
Narrative holds out for a certain inevitability, it places deep faith in cause and effect. Narrative is about reconstructing a chain of meaningful events based on a known outcome. Originally, it was a line in a Zen text.
Narrative in art makes us think about all sorts of interesting things, but it derails the engagement with a visual experience. It is the play between these two elements the narrative and experience that appeals to me most in this piece. The manuscript is above all: As I mentioned, I come at the novel through a background in visual art and experimental film and video.
Thanks for reminding me! So on to your concerns about the crisis of tenses in my manuscript: The last six months or so with XXXXX1 have been spent pushing these chapters as much as possible into present tense.
Some of the tense problems were simply artifacts from translating the older manuscript into a more present tense. I tried to be conscious of this over the last several months.
In many places, as you note, it is actually a false or synthetic present tense. Here are some notes I made to myself in response to your last letter where I try to figure it out for myself as I revised: I am more interested in stepping into the reverie and experience of a long journey where things, ideas, and overheard conversations start to bleed together.
Both of these approaches led to my dialogue being un-attributed. I wanted a certain floating quality, but tried to prep the exchanges when necessary to keep the reader connected.
I tried to go back and fine hone that more in this version. I was interested in how different pieces could come together to create meaning for my main character, which is also part of this trip and his interior journey.
The kid is almost mapping a cartography of his mind blended with the experience of being on the train. Once he maps out the location of his memory, he is basically stepping into it.Honors Thesis Second Reader Responsibilities *(student should remove from packet and give to Second Reader) 8/ dl E The second reader.
A regularly-appointed member of the ASU faculty or. Thesis writers should register for UH the second semester of their junior year.
The tutorial's objectives include choosing and narrowing the topic, collecting a working bibliography, preliminary reading of sources, and writing the proposal.
Your thesis adviser may recommend a second reader if s/he knows of another faculty member with expertise in your topic. After you name a second reader, you, your adviser, and the second reader should confer to determine in advance what role the second reader will play in advising the writing in progress and evaluating the completed thesis.
The thesis supervisor, in consultation with the student, determines when to bring the second reader on board. It is the supervisor’s prerogative to define how the grade for the thesis will be determined.
The production of the thesis typically takes from nine months to a year and consists of a proposal, which must be approved by the thesis advisor and second reader and submitted to the Graduate School, and multiple drafts of the thesis itself, which the student revises after .
Honors Thesis Second Reader Responsibilities *(student should remove from packet and give to Second Reader) 8/ dl E The second reader. A regularly-appointed member of the ASU faculty or.